The exercise works very well to make people and teams see and understand what is counter-productive behavior and that more often than not, they show some of this behavior on a daily basis.
There is a separate exercise about sabotaging customers.
- Unlimited number of groups
- Space for participants to work face-to-face in pairs and foursomes (chairs and tables are optional)
- Paper for participants to record observations and insights
- Silent self-reflection by individuals – how would you sabotage colleagues? (1 minute)
- Generate ideas in pairs, building on ideas from self-reflection for 2 minutes.
- Share and develop ideas from your pair in fours (notice similarities and differences) for 4 minutes.
- As a facilitator ask “What is one idea that stood out in your conversation?” with each group sharing one important idea with all participants for 5 minutes.
- Finally (on top of the “normal” 1-2-4-all), reflect on all ideas shared and discussed – which behavior are people showing on a regular basis and should be stopped to avoid making colleagues miserable? In some cases, it helps to collect all ideas in groups (so have the fours write down all the ideas) to then visually mark which anti-colleague behavior is practiced on a regular basis. This sometimes makes the frequency more tangible.
- Everyone in the group is included (often not the facilitator)
- Everyone has an equal opportunity to contribute
- In some cases, it helps to collect all ideas in groups (so have the fours write down all the ideas) to then visually mark which anti-customer behavior is practiced on a regular basis. This sometimes makes the frequency more tangible.
- Because of the structure, it neutralises the influence by a “leader”, making it a very useful exercise for unlocking a discussion that has become dysfunctional or stuck or for a group that tends to be excessively influenced by its leader.
- The exercise does not seem to work as part of a presentation (I never really got it to work) – I am not sure why (yet).
In November 2015, I almost died of a kidney rupture and a lung infection. It was an experience that changed my outlook on life profoundly. It was time to spend my time more wisely. First of all, I decided to make as many beautiful memories as possible. Secondly, I decided to not accept the horrible status quo of suboptimal relationships between companies and people anymore. Not as a consumer myself and certainly not as a professional. I started doing less meetings and more doings. Less powerpoints, more doing stuff. And even more than before, I obsessed about changing companies to be less about ads and more about acts – for both their customers and their colleagues. Impact is about doing. Start doing more.